We have always heard about cryptocurrencies, crypto exchange, banking, and trading platforms, but we do not really grasp the idea of crypto banking. Crypto banking is a contradicted idea. If crypto is to replace banks and give users full control of digital money, why do you put your crypto into the bank? The new research paper argued that there are risks for banks to adopt crypto, but they did it anyway.
Banks want crypto
Cryptocurrency has a rough road at the beginning and continues to experience a bumpy road ahead. The institutional investors were watching its performance. In early 2017, institutional investors had opportunities to adopt crypto, but they found out the return of the investments was less than traditional financial assets. Regulations were not a concern for some individual institutional owners, but banks were conservative at the time. As a result, some investors adopted it in early 2018 than banks did. Then suddenly, the crypto market took off in 2020, leaving many banks to regret their decision in 2017. Many banks set up their digital investment group to rush into the market and increase prices. Of course, many of their investment positions are instead of shadow positions. It is unclear how much they have been invested in and what vehicles they took to invest in cryptos.
Crypto exchange is a bank-like platform for crypto. Banks offered a place to purchase fiat currency. Crypto exchange did the same duty as traditional banks did. Since there was a gap between the crypto and banks, the crypto exchange took responsibility and offered crypto services. The crypto exchange took off after 2020, and they left banks in the dust. Then, crypto winter came in early 2022, and banks again hesitated to enter the crypto and started denouncing crypto usage, particularly in the Defi area. But interestingly, they tried to find ways to get into crypto without being directly exposed to cryptocurrencies—hint: through hedge funds.
How much banks exposure to crypto
We do not know how much banks have been exposed to crypto. We learned that the big Wall Street players were exposed to the services of the digital asset through State Street of their $41.7 trillion assets. Some have been exposed due to Luna’s collapse and 3AC bankruptcy. But again, no specific dollar amount was provided.
Since the crypto winter, institutional investors have been cautious about crypto exposure. However, crypto exchanges are the winner again. They are exposed to crypto and take risks more than banks do. As a result, they likely will weather the uncertainty. Furthermore, there is no need for crypto banking to handle your crypto assets since many such services will not survive long in the crypto environment.
Crypto is resilience
Despite its fluctuating price and unsecured assets, crypto is resilient to phase out any bad business ideas and bad actors in the economy who wants to or try to dominate the market but who transfers risks to users to believe they are the one who should take responsibility for their carelessness. Unfortunately, those business models will not survive long.
If you enjoy reading my articles, buy me a coffee here.
Deglobalization is happening
Deglobalization is happening. Whether or not you believe it.
Since the beginning of 2000, manufacturing power has awakened in Asia, and economists believed that globalization would benefit the whole world.
I am not sure if that is totally accurate, but some countries did better than others.
For example, China has been successfully becoming the world’s second most significant economic zone.
Not until COVID-19 hit and the war between Russia and Ukraine, did the deglobalization accelerate.
However, deglobalization will make currency fluctuate more than ever.
Due to geopolitical concerns, some countries’ currencies would not be tradable globally, making cryptocurrencies more attractive than ever.
Blockchain and crypto may become an alternative to help citizens whose countries with weaker currency to preserve the value of their assets.
Despite political differences, citizens are innocent of political conflicts, and they have options to use cryptocurrencies to buy necessities.
Of course, there will be political disputes such as financial sanction avoidance resulting from the banning of blockchain technology such as tornado cash, and the technology will improve through different ways to achieve the same alternative.
Deglobalization will also result in many countries becoming more isolated than ever. Cryptocurrencies can help citizens to avoid the drag of the nation.
Deglobalization may be a part of political conflict, but you can become apolitical and help yourself.
Kim Kardashian’s $1.26 million crypto ticket
The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged $1.26M to Kim Kardashian for social media promotion of a cryptocurrency offered by EthereumMax (EMAX).
Kim Kardashian failed to disclose the payment she received for promoting EMAX.
Ryan Huegerich and many other claimants filed a class-action lawsuit against Kim Kardashian, Floyd Mayweather Jr, and Paul Pierce in a California district court, for promoting an Ethereum knockoff, Ethereum Max (EMAX), according to a lawsuit filed on January 7.
At least, “not financial advice” is not a disclaimer of promoting crypto of any kind.
Kim’s influence did make the unknown token become an investment asset as a result:
A striking 19% of respondents who said they heard about the post invested in EthereumMax as a result.
And she claimed to make more money than an entire season of her reality television show that further demonstrating her involvement in the promotion marking:
While it is unclear what the precise terms of the financial compensation that Defendant Kardashian was given by the Executive Defendants, Defendant Kardashian routinely gets paid between $300,000 and $1 million for most promotional posts.
What is EMAX?
According to the filed lawsuit,
EthereumMax has no connection to the second largest cryptocurrency, Ethereum. This name association appears to be an effort by the Company and the Executive Defendants to mislead investors into believing that the EMAX Tokens were a part of the Ethereum network (when they are not). It would be akin to marketing a restaurant as “McDonald’sMax” when it had no affiliation with McDonald’s other than the name similarity and the fact that both companies sell food products.
EthereumMax is to build a robust and scalable ecosystem that fully maximizes the power of DeFi, creating a wide range of products for our community that encompasses everything from a deflationary token and a core stablecoin for processing payments to curing edge NFTs and exclusive events for our community, according to its whitepaper.
Of course, it sounds just like BS. This type of token puts every buzz words together that means nothing.
The court document further approved this assumption:
In plain terms, EthereumMax’s entire business model relies on using constant marketing and promotional activities, often from “trusted” celebrities, to dupe potential investors into trusting the financial opportunities available with EMAX Tokens.
If you check their source code, no devs are working, and codes are forked from open-source codes as usual.
And after dumping and rug-pulling investors, the token majority still controlled by creator(s).
Pump and Dump
Following the EMAX Token’s launch and Defendants’ promotional activities in May 2021, the trading volume and price of EthereumMax surged. By May 30, EMAX already had a transaction volume of over $100 million, up 632% in just two weeks. The day before, it reached its maximum price of $0.000000863, which represents a rise of 1,370% more than its initial price of $0.00000005875.
However, this meteoric rise did not last long, and EthereumMax began to deflate immediately after Defendant Kardashian’s post. On July 15, the price of the EMAX Token hit its all-time low: $0.000000017 per unit, a 98% drop from which it has not been able to recover. On August 1, its transaction volume plummeted to $157,423, which is less than a hundredth of its initial capital.
The result is the price will never get recover.
Celebrities’ promotion of crypto in the future
This is to set a precedence for the SCE to prohibit celebrities and social influencers promote unsecured cryptocurrencies.
“This case is a reminder that, when celebrities or influencers endorse investment opportunities, including crypto asset securities, it doesn’t mean that those investment products are right for all investors,” said SEC Chair Gary Gensler. “We encourage investors to consider an investment’s potential risks and opportunities in light of their own financial goals.”
“Ms. Kardashian’s case also serves as a reminder to celebrities and others that the law requires them to disclose to the public when and how much they are paid to promote investing in securities,” Chair Gensler added.
“The federal securities laws are clear that any celebrity or other individual who promotes a crypto asset security must disclose the nature, source, and amount of compensation they received in exchange for the promotion,” said Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “Investors are entitled to know whether the publicity of a security is unbiased, and Ms. Kardashian failed to disclose this information.”
Moral hazard or not, the SCE does make crypto space a better space.
Not an expert
Web3 is the weird place ever. A bunch of people got together to build something that may or may not work.
So why is Web3 the future?
Death of an expert
Who claimed to be an expert? Unfortunately, there are more and more experts on the internet. Watching YouTube for 10 minutes can boost your confident 100%, and watching a week of YouTube has prepared you to teach the rest of the internet how things work.
What makes an expert, then? If you can tell everything that the internet is searchable may not make you the one.
You probably will consider an expert is someone who can provide answers precisely and quickly.
It is not. An expert is a person who can question precisely such field and research depths to provide plausible solutions and make solutions workable.
The problem of the internet, particularly with YouTube guru channels, is that they present them as experts on some kind and get very general solutions to the problem that sound precise. However, because many of us do not have a background in such subject matters, it makes us fall within the expert trap and believe them to sound correct.
Because we did not spend time around the subject, we had no specific expectations about what will happen rather than believing someone told us what would happen.
Scientific Inquiry vs. Guesstimate
There are usually 6 steps to discovering the truth through:
1. Observe and Ask Question: in this stage, we think about a question because of our observations
2. Research: we research our question
3. Formulate a Hypothesis: we come up with a theory
4. Test your Hypothesis: we test our theory in a fair and unbiased way
5. Conclude: we conclude a result of our research
6. Share Results: we share our idea with other people
However, many of the internet shares guesstimate results and skip step 4.
They offer solutions without possible persistence and observe the conclusion they make.
When the internet was doing guesstimate, we made fun of them.
When the government started doing guesstimate, we should be worried.
And that is precisely we are heading into serious trouble when the government is guesstimating our economy.
Why Web3 then? Maybe it is just a guesstimate?!
- Crypto News11 months ago
Kryll (KRL), LCX (LCX) SUKU (SUKU) and OriginTrail (TRAC) are launching on Coinbase Pro
- Blockchain12 months ago
DeSo Announces $50 Million In Funding for Developers
- Blockchain1 year ago
DeSo | Decentralized Social Media Network
- Bitcoin10 months ago
Simple Analogy Explains How Bitcoin Works
- Crypto News12 months ago
Unpacking The DESOlaters with William Laurent
- Blockchain10 months ago
DeSo : Decentralizing Social Media Apps
- Crypto News10 months ago
Multichain Metazens Emerged In The Metaverse
- Blockchain11 months ago
How to Get Free DeSo Crypto